My Account
Family History, Alleged Professional Misconduct, Financial Exploitation and Continuing Injustice
Purpose of this record: To document my Mother’s and my experiences, the treatment of my Mother, the financial and personal losses we have endured, and the patterns of conduct that I believe have perpetuated injustice over more than 50 years.
1. The Root of the Problem
I believe the root of our family's difficulties lies in failures within the New Zealand justice system and in a wider pattern of professional misconduct, conflicts of interest, dishonesty and lack of accountability. In my experience, these problems have persisted for 50 + years and continue to affect us, even when the people involved are no longer in New Zealand.
The recurring pattern is one of people presenting themselves as trustworthy professionals or responsible representatives while acting in ways that appear contrary to the interests of those they are supposed to serve.
They say one thing and do another. They claim to protect vulnerable people while, in my view, contributing to their financial losses, personal hardship and continuing disadvantage.
I see this as a longstanding pattern of double standards, avoidance of responsibility and the transfer of the consequences of other people's actions onto us, including me personally.
2. The Alleged Conflict of Interest Involving John
One of the most troubling examples concerns John, who, according to my account, acted for my Mother over approximately 35 years while also acting for, or supporting the interests of, my younger sisters, whom I regard as abusive and narcissistic.
I believe this created a serious and unresolved conflict of interest. A person cannot properly protect someone's interests while simultaneously acting against those interests for the benefit of others whose actions are in dispute.
My concerns include the following:
John allegedly failed to communicate with us adequately over a period of approximately 35 years.
I believe he failed to protect my Mother's and our joint financial interests and subsequently assisted in circumstances in which her estate was depleted.
I have serious concerns about unexplained transactions involving her accounts over many years. Explanations or records that were provided were, in my view, unsatisfactory.
I believe he was acting in conflicting capacities while continuing to receive payment or other financial benefits. The NZ law society completely fails to take action against all claims of outrageous negligence in our lives.
I have not seen any accountability for the financial and personal consequences of these actions.
In my view, these circumstances raise serious questions about professional ethics, fiduciary responsibility, transparency and the protection of a vulnerable client.
My concern is not simply about one person. It is about the apparent failure of the systems and professionals responsible for ensuring that conflicts are identified, disclosed and properly managed.
3. The Power of Attorney Concern
At one point, John allegedly pressured my Mother to sign a power of attorney concerning property in favour of my younger sister, in 1990’s. There was no need for this, as Mother was in good health and working 7 days a week.
I understand that the document contained an error in my Mother's name, despite identification being available. I believe this raised questions about the document's validity and the care taken in preparing it.
Later, when my Mother was emergency hospitalised, a specialist advised me to arrange a Power of Attorney. It was only months afterwards that the earlier document was located and revoked.
The sequence of events remains troubling to me. It raises questions about why the earlier document was prepared, whether it was valid, why it was not properly identified and addressed sooner, and whether my mother's interests were adequately protected throughout the process.
These are matters I believe require a clear documentary explanation rather than assumptions or unsupported assurances.
4. My Mother's Matrimonial Settlement and Financial Hardship
My mother was left to raise six children with extremely limited resources following the breakdown of her marriage.
According to my account, she acted on advice from New Zealand solicitors to leave the farm with little more than the clothes on our backs. The family was left without the financial security that should have been addressed through an appropriate matrimonial settlement.
I believe the solicitors and other professionals involved failed to secure any settlement for my mother's welfare. I also understand that she did not receive the child allowance she needed to support her children.
The amount I recall was approximately $5 per month per child. Whatever the precise entitlement and amount, my mother was left struggling to raise 3 girls, 9. 10 & 12 without adequate financial support for herself or us. Only after 7 years of fighting in the courts, did she receive pittance, for our maintenance. After that NZ changed the laws to 50% matrimonial settlement, however NZ and every solicitor continues to coverup the massive imbalance and unbearable extreme hardship forced onto my Mother for her entire adult life, for her to remain in silence while those solicitors, judicial officers et al continue to this day, exploiting our privacy, our ID for their own personal gain, as these cycles repeat unless there is proper intervention.
She was expected to provide for children who were approximately 9, 10 and 12 years old, among others, while having little financial security of her own.
My mother subsequently worked multiple jobs, reportedly from around 4 a.m. until midnight, throughout the year, in order to give us the best education, which the court completely ignored, as it was up to the sisters to educate themselves. They chose to do nothing have lived on government funding all their lives, yet never passed school exams. To take our property for them to retire, which includes 45 years of my life, mostly 365 days, as I was the guarantor to all Mother’s loans, is absolute abuse, is human trafficking and if you took the time to hear the details, is actually genocide from the NZ corrupt justice system and it’s employees.
I regard this as an extraordinary burden to place on a woman who had already been left without adequate financial protection. The consequences extended far beyond the immediate hardship. They affected the my Mothers’s and my opportunities, security and wellbeing for decades.
I also question why professionals could continue to receive legal aid funding or other payments while, in my view, failing to achieve the outcomes that my mother needed.
I believe the circumstances warrant a proper examination of the legal services provided, the fees charged, the advice given and the results achieved.
5. Tony Beatson and the Failure to Provide Effective Assistance
I also record my concerns about Tony Beatson, whom I understood to be a newly appointed attorney.
In my view, he did little or nothing effective for approximately three years. I believe he failed to secure the child allowance that my mother needed and did not achieve the financial outcome necessary to support her and the children.
This overrated prick was fully funded on legal aid, for his conflicted unprofessional double standards, and never provided a cent for Mother nor us. That is 100% legal incompetence, failure to perform and not fit for purpose. They hate being exposed, but the truth is undeniable, and based on fact.
My concern is that the appointment of a professional representative created an expectation that someone would finally take responsibility and act in the family's interests. Instead, I believe the period of representation passed without him achieving anything but him looting from legal aid.
To me, this became another example of a recurring pattern: substantial expectations, inaction, no benefit and no satisfactory accountability.
More than 50 years later, I continue to see similar patterns in the conduct of people whose names include Tony, Anthony, John, Michael, Chris, Peter, Richard, Matthew , James.
I recognise that a name alone establishes nothing about a person's conduct, however their same vibrations and seeing the same patterns of exploitation, manipulation, dishonest, committing perjury and intentional harm caused are undeniable, wherever they are. My concern is with the specific behaviour and circumstances, their repeated patterns of abuse, exploitation and what amounts to human trafficking, that I associate with the individuals involved. To me, the vibration of the name tony, & john and others is unchanged and over these 50 yrs are recurring patterns over and over
6. John Jackson, Richard Hawk and Other Legal Representatives
I also record concerns about John Jackson, Richard Hawk and others whom I believe failed to protect my Mother's interests.
In my view, they failed to secure any matrimonial settlement to support her welfare, despite the enormous responsibility she faced in raising and educating six children, single handling then being forced to raise 3 girls alone,
I am particularly troubled by what I regard as a disparity between the payments made to legal professionals and the results delivered to the people who needed their assistance. They manipulate the system that is undeniable and coverup the truths. When challenged, each time they backflipped, were abusive, unprofessional and tried to foboff their failures to blame us.
My concerns include:
The failure to secure financial support for my mother.
The absence of a satisfactory matrimonial settlement.
The alleged failure to obtain the child support or allowance she needed.
The apparent lack of adequate communication and accountability.
The continuing financial and personal consequences for her and myself. Is irrational that after 50 years of separation, we both are exploited to fund $950,000 each for the 2 estranged sisters, who had partners on huge regular incomes, have never had a mortgage of their own, and the banks are using me to pay the mortgages on the property sold by the courts in 2022, to this day, so I have nothing to exist on.
I believe these matters should be assessed through the relevant files, financial records, correspondence and legal decisions. My account was never fully put to any court, as mostly the court refused to accept, they blocked everything, even blocked me from attending by not transferring my call, and completely ignored what evidence I gave, then within weeks deleted the complete file from court records. That is abuse of process and a gross miscarriage of justice.
The sisters know they did nothing, were not there and know they were not there.
No solicitor nor judge questioned them about their efforts over the 40+ years, nor what they did with their own double incomes. There was no evidence from them only their falsified narratives and lies.
7. Alleged Conduct Within the Family
I also record my concerns about the conduct of my sisters and their spouses, including individuals I identify as John, James, Peter, Mark., Bret. Ann and Garry.( youngest daughter inlaws )spent all their lives on government handouts, including from Singapore government for his brief time in army surplus, and only came to abuse and use us, yet look they had more than we did) This is their home, yet they came to extort from us, heavily burdened with continuous mortgages for 40+ years, ongoing. Themselves never had one mortgage of their own)
I believe there were longstanding disputes involving relationships, family loyalties, money and responsibility. Fact is , some family members benefited from circumstances in which my Mother and myself were left disadvantaged.
I have particular concerns about the behaviours of my sisters and the people who supported them, and about the absence of accountability for the consequences of their actions. Some of these are documented on this site, some not yet.
The eldest sister
I recall a relationship involving John and my eldest sister that ended unsuccessfully. I also recall disputes concerning alcohol and allegations of violence. Yet the narcissistic abuser had continuous support from her father’s family her entire life.
The next sister
I also have concerns about the sister ( deceased – michelle van camp) who attempted to study law. In my view, the circumstances surrounding her and the legal representation provided to my Mother raise further questions about conflicting interests and whether my Mother's interests were properly protected. There was no need for her to use Mother’s solicitor and reeks of internal corruption that they both colluded to do deals to undermine us.
The youngest sister and her spouse
I have serious concerns about my youngest sister and her spouse, Peter John Scholm.
I allege that they benefited from family resources without making any corresponding contribution. I also recall concerns about alcohol and other goods allegedly taken from Air New Zealand for their own fake wedding.
I state I was not invited to the wedding.
These incidents form part of my broader concerns about family relationships, the use of resources and the absence of accountability. She knows she was not there and knows she never did anything for Mother, unless she took cash upfront, yet undeclared in income. Her claims of managing property is preposterous, as tenant told her what to do. The judge completely failed to take on board facts. The fact the scholsm claim to be from government funding yet were hellbent on thieving from us, extorting and making claims yet there was no contribution from them. The kids were all names after the inlaws. FACT.
Use disabled deceased mother with mortgages and no wage, to provide for this lot living in luxury on government handouts all their lives: This is schollum family home, there was no need for them to extort from a single mother with no support and keep doing that over the 40 years.
named the kids after the inlaws only returned to us to extort, abuse and gas light.
8. The Building Work and Financial Losses
My concerns extend beyond legal and family matters to building work that I believe was carried out improperly.
The plumber identified as john greg Chichester – the same first names of the dishonest attorneys that acted for 48 years estranged oldest narcissistic abuser sister who had 2 partners on huge regular incomes, each building her new homes, gave her new cars, no kids, and no mortgages. She had no needs
I allege that a plumber named John carried out work that did not comply with the applicable building requirements.
The issues I recall include:
Incorrect plasterboard, or GIB, materials.
Incorrect or inadequate insulation.
Plumbing pipes in the ensuite being moved towards a wall adjoining another tenancy, in circumstances I believe breached the building code.
I estimate the resulting loss at approximately $90,000.
Imported materials and other tradespeople
I also have concerns about imported materials and tradespeople, including German-imported products or services that I understood to be associated with the work.
I allege that further incorrect plasterboard was used and subsequently concealed behind expensive tiles. In my view, this made the defects more difficult to identify and rectify, increasing the financial burden on us.
These matters need to be assessed against building plans, specifications, invoices, inspection records, photographs, expert reports and the building requirements applicable at the time.
My broader concern is that defective or non-compliant work can leave property owners carrying enormous costs to repair problems created by others.
Where such failures are deliberate or recklessly concealed, I believe accountability should extend to the responsible individuals and businesses.
9. The Wider Pattern of Building and Professional Failures
From the 1970s onwards, I recall other individuals who presented themselves as finance professionals or people with the necessary expertise to undertake substantial projects.
I have concerns about buildings in central business districts that, according to my understanding, were constructed without adequate fire hydrant systems or with other deficiencies arising from cost-cutting.
I believe these problems cannot always be explained as the isolated mistakes of one individual. They may reflect broader failures of supervision, professional competence, regulatory enforcement and accountability.
The consequences can be serious. When buildings are incomplete or non-compliant, the owners and occupants may be left to live with the risks and bear the cost of repairs.
I believe there should be proper accountability for defective work, particularly where the defects are concealed or the responsible parties have represented the work as compliant.
I also understand that some individuals associated with these matters left New Zealand and have not, in my view, been held accountable. I have concerns about the use of public money to address problems where those responsible may not have contributed fairly to resolving them.
These concerns require evidence of the particular projects, the responsible parties, the regulatory findings and any public expenditure involved.
10. The Continuing Impact Over More Than 50 Years
What troubles me most is the apparent continuity of these experiences.
Over more than 50 years, I believe my Mother and I have repeatedly encountered people who make assurances, assume positions of trust, fail to deliver what is required and leave others to bear the consequences.
The names associated with these experiences include several judicial officers and attorneys et others, John, James, Richard, Peter, Gary, Michael, Tony, Anthony, Chris and Matthew, kate, elizabeth, ann, among others.
I am concerned about repeated patterns of:
Conflicts of interest and divided loyalties.
Financial dealings that have not been satisfactorily explained.
Professional services that have failed to deliver meaningful results.
Defective work and alleged non-compliance with building requirements.
Avoidance of responsibility when harm has occurred.
Attempts to shift the financial, practical or emotional burden onto our family.
A lack of transparency and meaningful remedies.
I believe the recurring issue is the gap between what people claim to do and what they actually do.
A professional title, a promise of assistance or a position of authority should not be enough to establish trust. Conduct, evidence, competence and accountability are what matter.
11. Concerns About Accountability and Personal Responsibility
I am particularly troubled by what I perceive as a willingness among some people to blame others for the consequences of their own decisions.
I also believe some of the people involved have reacted poorly to criticism, avoided scrutiny and refused to acknowledge the harm caused by their decisions.
To me, accountability means being prepared to answer reasonable questions, provide records, explain financial transactions, acknowledge mistakes and make appropriate remedies where harm has been established.
It should apply equally to legal professionals, tradespeople, family members, public officials and anyone else who assumes responsibility for another person's interests or property.
12. Other Individuals Whose Conduct Concerns Me
I also record concerns about Ann Elizabeth Hinton, Kate Elizabeth Davenport, Margaret, heather, maureen and others.
My experiences have led me to question the conduct and integrity of these individuals.
The purpose of recording their names is to show the repeated patterns o f the names and their vibrations that recur many times over the 50 years. This is not to say that everyone with the name Kate is dishonest, however when it recurs the person is hellbent stuck in lies. The patterns and same abusive behaviours are prevalent and not to be ignored.
Overall Assessment
Looking back across these experiences, I believe my Mother and I endured decades of avoidable hardship arising from a combination of inadequate legal assistance, unresolved financial concerns, family conflict, defective building work and a perceived lack of accountability.
My mother was left to work extraordinarily long hours to support her children after, in my view, failing to receive the financial protection and assistance she needed. This has not happened since, to any other Mother. The fact that every NZ government employee avoids and silences, including the conflicted United Nations Human Rights council as they ignore individual persons, when they should not. But you have manipulations as ex NZ government employees force themselves into the UNHRC to coverup these individual human rights abuses, human trafficking and genocide, as they do not want the truth known.
I believe my Moher’s estate and my livelihood were subsequently placed at risk, while professionals and other individuals who should have acted responsibly failed to provide satisfactory explanations or remedies, instead used gas lighting, abuse, threats and extortions.
The impact has not been limited to financial loss. It has also involved years of uncertainty, the effort required to identify and repair defects, the difficulty of obtaining answers and the continuing burden of trying to establish what happened and hold the justice system accountable for using us as human traffic.
I do not believe these experiences should simply be forgotten because time has passed.
The passage of time does not remove the importance of preserving records, identifying what can be established, understanding how decisions were made and exposing the corruption, and committing perjury from employees within the entire justice system and NZ government funded employees.
14. Matters I Want Preserved for Future Reference
The following matters are particularly important to me:
My Mother's financial position: The circumstances in which she left the farm, the matrimonial settlement, the child allowance, the work she undertook to support her children and the financial consequences for the family.
Legal representation: The work undertaken by Tony Beatson, , John Jackson, Richard Hawk and other representatives, including the services provided, if any as it seems the NZlaw society intentionally used us as human traffic and still do, payments received, advice given and results achieved. The fact all solicitors and those that claim they represented yet only acted to violate the Will, are negligent, incompetent and not fit for purpose, knew they are wrong, so engaged in gas lighting, abuse, threats and extortions is undeniable.
Conflicts of interest: The circumstances in which John acted for my Mother while, in my view, also acting in the interests of my sisters in ways that renders him conflicted.
The power of attorney: The original document, the spelling error, its validity, the circumstances in which it was signed, the later discovery and revocation.
5. Building defects: The plumbing, insulation, plasterboard, ensuite alterations, imported materials, alleged code breaches and estimated losses of approximately $90,000. This is not the only one.
Other construction projects: Any evidence of incomplete or non-compliant buildings, inadequate fire safety systems, regulatory failures and the identity of the parties responsible.
Family disputes and alleged misuse of resources: The specific incidents, individuals, dates and available supporting records.
Continuing consequences: The costs, time, disruption and other burdens imposed on me by the events described.
Comments