Behind the Scenes: Exposing Corrupt Practices in Estate Disputes

Description: This article will uncover the often-concealed unethical practices in estate disputes, informing you about the corruption that is too common and some of what I experienced for 7 years and still today.

This case, not only in the high court Auckland is a Gross Miscarriage of Justice.

As Sole Beneficiary in my Mother's valid Probated Will, I have rights that nobody else has.

No judge nor any solicitor has any right to tell me or anyone how to spend a cent from this Testatrix's estate. To spend and violate the wishes of the Testatrix, they are commiting fraud.

No judge nor any solicitor nor anyone from the justice system nor any sibling has any right to spend a cent without consultation and approval from the Sole Beneficiary.

No judge nor trustee has any right to spend a cent without consultation with me.

Is my case the trustee, appointed after I had already adminsiterd my Mother 's estate as I was Sole Executrix and Sole Beneficiary , is to only act for the benefit of the beneficiary.

I am the only Beneficiary.

This is where NZ law society are corrupt.

They ask for money within minutes of contacting them, yet they cannot tell what they do, what is their plan, what is their track record of success.

They have no records, 7 years of this 50 years of garbage from solicitors.

None to date tell you what they do.

Those that are talking heads with "what you shoulda/could do" they quit, suddenly in 24 hours are filled with excuses.

Or those that are aggressive in wanting a retainer, grabbed that and quit, then lie to the court to try to blame you the client. There's scammers in the NZ law society.

Show us how many deceased estates christopher robert darlow has bankrupted.

Never ever go near christopher robert darlow as grove darlow and associate are notorious for bankrupting deceased estates, gross mismanagment and funnelling estates through 100's of companies and property developments he is associated with big time.

This is highly illegal. The nz law society is corrupt, as noted by UNHRC 2000, and they cover up by using reprehensible abusive tactics to abuse you the client.

All judges are equally guilty , to overlook, including the abusive john simon moore, who used an hour of court time to abuse the Sole Beneficiary in person, then is so guilty held the next in private and to hide his filthy and lies, typical of those from kings school, where he put himself on the board. We know all about kings school families before this abusive wee high court judical officier got himself on the board.

We know simon has a history of misogyy and abusing this Testatrix, to deprive her of her Rights and is a human trafficker as is him who never wanted this Testatrix to have a thing.

That means, simon never wanted this Mother to have no home, no job, no social connections, no car, no home, no clothes, no shoes, no food, nothing.

There is only one vibration of "simon," nothing has changed in over 50 years. Negative guilty vibration, so uses human trafficking to try to extinguish lives.

another is ann hinton who falsifies narratives that have no factual bases, mocked the disabled deceased Testatrix in the court, appears to be alocholic and cannot process the info, only takes on 1part of the case from 1 side, the rest she is shut down.

She is negligent, is unable to interpret financial information, has no brains to ask what it means..

'ann' has a history of lifetimes of abuses of this Testatrix from childhood.

ann has only 1 vibration and her's is negative, abusive, filled with guilt, does not want the truth to be told. This 'ann' has falsified her narrative to coverup the reality. Her narrative has no factual basis.

A balanced honest person is not so hellbent on relentlessly, and repeatedly desperately going to media to silence those who put in the work, like this ann hinton does. Her's are the behaviours of a guilty person, covering up the corruption in the justice system for over 50 years and obviously the payments her and others take under the bench.

This "ann" so out of control, breaches Human Rights, mocks a disabled deceased person in the court.

tells the other side what to say in the witness box. Abuse of process, biased, corrupt judical officer/conwoman.

only 2 examples of the corruption and gross miscarriage of justice that happens in Auckland courts.

This is typical experience when you call or visit:

Based on my interactions with this petty species, it is clear that his approach lacks the integrity, respect, and professionalism required in this field. His smarty pantys words demonstrated an inability to manage the matters at hand, and his failure to uphold basic standards of justice and fairness is alarming.

His behaviour has been inconsistent, often contradicting his own statements within minutes of the call, which suggests a lack of clarity and direction. This, combined with his unprofessional attitude, gives the impression that this species is out of his depth and is filled with excuses that he is unavailable, lies about him going to the court, ++ nobody should trust him.

It is evident from his past actions that problem-solving and accountability are not his strengths. The excuses and justifications from him, only reinforce the perception of incompetence, and his involvement in this case, for all of few minutes, has been counterproductive.

Given the seriousness of the matter at hand and his unsatisfactory performance, I strongly believe that steven is not fit for purpose in this case. I suggest you reconsider, as his actions are neither contributing to a resolution nor in alignment with the standards required in this sector.

We tried another with same name vibration, we did not even get to trial, as he was blocked from registration. The messing with this case, would not be the only 'steven', so one and the same. Is not for us to try to sort him out from his own problems nor coax him nor give him time, his harm and damage is irreversible, and nobody should go near steven arulogan

Nobody contacts a legal representative to have them snapping, grumpy, abusive, asking impertinent questions, making idiotic assumptions, when they have not identified themselves, not shown they have no conflicts of interest, nor shown any respect nor integrity, nor honesty.

Is them who need to be investigated as is clear they are money laundering. So many wanted cash and were taking regular holidays, taking the cash out through atm s overseas for years and years.   How is that fair?

Calling yourself  a solicitor is not entitlement to luxury living and exploiting us for your own personal selfish gain, using abuse, threats, extortion and even genocide.

Don’t try to tell me justice is not fair. Grow up. Stop the rot in the law society and justice system.

Is not possible to engage steven keall, his attitude is too conflicted.

Do not use the word “urgent” near any nz solicitor, that sets them up as a red flag, they cannot handle it and go into avoidant behaviours.

There you have more, they do not believe in what they are doing. Repeatedly we experience they show themselves as conmen/scammers, unscrupulous and of ill intent.

In addition, there are serious concerns about his behaviour and approach. His unwillingness to listen to reason, coupled with a clear bias, reflects poorly on his ability to handle this matter objectively. In my opinion, his actions demonstrate a lack of professionalism and integrity, and I find it difficult to justify any continued engagement or compensation for his services, anytime for anyone, and would only be falsified services, habitual in Auckland.

His conduct does not align with the standards expected, and I believe it would be in everyone’s best interest to block his involvement henceforward.

Nobody should have to put up with the abuse, and in this case, 50 years yet none of them did anything for us.

Giving an inch and taking $1000000’s. yes MILLIONS $s  more is what they do.

No empathy, they commit genocide.

So far, more like sheep as they copy one another.

Actually is human trafficking.

There is no repeat business, they are too inconsistent, you could not trust them.

They tell you not to trust them as they break their rules, put their to protect the client.

How many solicitors do you know who hand people $1000, $10000, $20000, $70000 nothing written what they are to do for the money, no questions asked.

Yet this is what they aggressively demand, often within minutes of meeting them.

See they are telling you they are untrustworthy.

Judges have no brains as they never check the competency of their officers of the court.

The way they operate is as arrogant scammers, hypocrites, no sense of what is right thing to do.

Man they want you to wait for them while they economically rape, torture and commit genocide.

Their double standards, is their problem. They know it is, so use avoidant behaviour to only get the easy jobs that you would do yourself if the equally obnoxious prejudiced judicial officers did their job properly, listened to both sides, made decisions based on fact, and quit taking payments under the bench. Take  alook at the case law, not only this case, they ramble on about waffle.  There was one small petty male, james little, who like the sheep, would not tell you what he was doing, or needed to do.

That's right isn't it. the jerk did not know what himself was doing nor whether there was any practical sense to what he was doing, responds like a two-year old, and is the worst at failing to explain so the jerk can charge for his garbage responses rendering him not fit for purpose. It seems there was noone in the nz law society that could tell him what to do. They have no track records, they do not care.

Only talks at you like moron, repeating obvious stuff, no skills needed there. 

When he gets in front of judicial officer that obviously takes the cash under the bench is oh so infantile.

This is his procedure: says 2 short phrases, yeah like a 2 year old, that has no relevance.

Then waits for judicial officer to look at him and nod. Next 2 more phrases. wait for the judicial officer to look at him and nod. This moron, repeats his infantile rorting  process for at least 20 minutes.

 This is abuse of process, none of that was necessary, nor relevant nor pertinent. 

That prick is not worth a cent. Nobody needs a bore, likes the sound of his own voice, a delinquent, unprofessional behaviour to then falsify $20,000 invoice, is corruption.

Other members of the law society, hate to hear these experiences, so they too go into avoidant behaviours.  They were not taught anything at school. So why are they there?

In reality, another scammer exploiting deceased estates, that knowingly deprived us of a future, as this case is known to the nz law society for 50 years, as they commit genocide.

We should be allowed to tell the facts to a court, the judicial officers have a duty of care to listen, and take action in our best interests, when is obvious exploitation over decades.

Instead in NZ, they are obnoxious, poisoning your chances, abuse you for an hour with their vile poisonous venom of hatred, yet they have both hands in the public purse abusing the “5’ as they have no respect for money, stealing $550000 pa. 

By these judges stifling our lives, for 50 years, exploiting us from cradle to the grave, is genocide.

They do not want it to be told, this is why they use abuse, threats and extortion to overwhelm you, run amuck and confuse, so you are in dire financial position, they would be unaffordable. They tell you that at the start. They "are unaffordable." why are they there? rusty from them not putting in the work, and them do not know what to do. That's obvious.

Yet all the while the other side, joleane schollum,  and the c…. loraine fletcher,  never passed any school exams lived off government funding all their lives and double incomes with spouses on huge regular incomes, repeatedly exploiting Mother and abusing her Human Rights.

Struggling to Find Proper Legal Representation

Exhaustive Search for Help

• Spent 24 hours a day, literally, searching for a legal rep who does their job properly  and tells you what they can do. They love to charge you to tell you what they won't do.

• Contacted bar associations and covered the entire country of law society searches over the 7 years, some 14000+ of them.

Rude and Unprofessional Responses

• barristers and their receptionists were often obnoxious and brash.

• Many displayed ignorance, prejudice, and discrimination, engaging in gas lighting from the start. Receptionists had same behaviours too.

• They made assumptions before even understanding the case or determining their area of expertise.

Lack of Listening and Communication Skills

• Barely listen for seconds, not minutes.

• Ask irrelevant questions without structure.

• No mention of conflicts of interest during initial conversations.

• Under pressure, they become angry easily if you speak too quickly or too slowly. Threaten to quit often, yet KC told me they are not allowed to quit, in engagement rules, thought they all do.

One-Sided Expectations

• clients are expected to adjust and cater to their demands.

• solicitors give nothing in return but insinuations and verbal abuse.

• they have no critical thinking skills, no legal strategy, no plan, no structure

• they ask no questions of what they are doing

• judges the same, they asked no questions of the other side; took the other side's wants as evidence. Bias, total lack of impartiality, and falsifying facts by judges destroyed our massive lives of work; is genocide. If you have similar experience, where judges have violated you to the core, to steal your equity and ruin your future, contact me below.

Depravity of Justice

• The legal system is supposed to uphold standards, yet these are continuously ignored.

• Solicitors charge exorbitant rates but are slow, unstructured, and need constant spoon-feeding and they need to be held accountable for their results. They have no track record of success. That is a red flag, the law society overlooks. They do not care.

Personal Biases and Unprofessionalism

• Personal opinions, views and judgments often overshadow the case.

• Some junior barristers intentionally sabotage cases, showing jealousy and spite.

• Defamatory statements in briefs covertly inserted by barristers to defame the client prevent cases from progressing.

• they often make defamatory statements to other barristers and in the court about the client, yet some had no conversation with me. They shut down all communication.

Cultural Conflicts and Dishonesty

• Some legal professionals' conflicts of interest and cultural attitudes lead to dishonest behaviour.

• Their refusal to engage with reality harms their clients' cases, as their condescension is them not able to accept the reality nor truth.

Law School Failures

• Law schools aren't teaching ethics or professionalism, leading to poor client treatment.

• solicitors waste hours playing dumb games and engage in personal attacks instead of focusing on the case. They are filled with rot. This has caused loss of case, and 45 years of life, 365 days, and the Testatrix massive life of 85 years of which 50 consecutive years were 365 days of modern day slave labour. This case is unique as is direct result of Testatrix acting upon the advice of NZ solicitors 50 years. The results speak for themselves. The justice system is guilty of crimes against humanity, to force one Mother into 50 years of 365 hardship, no judge in NZ allowing her a cent for her own welfare. We both were expected to exist on nothing. No normal life, no home, no car, no shoes, no social connections, no clothes, no job and no food, but we had the work, often unpaid.

Out of Control Behaviour

• Their frustration and overwork don't justify their unprofessional behaviour. They all had paid holidays, often they took huge payouts on work subsidies during covid, and took from the estate at same time. I had no wage in 24 years, though paid the mortgages.

• It’s the solicitors, not the clients, who are out of control. Solicitors claim they are legal doing illegal things. They need to be taken to task.

• their high maintenance lifestyle are out of control, especially when the work is pathetic, not good enough, shows they have not put in the work.

Top of Form